Current Location: Home> Latest Articles> What’s the Difference Between MD5 and SHA-1 in PHP? A Guide to Hash Function Comparison

What’s the Difference Between MD5 and SHA-1 in PHP? A Guide to Hash Function Comparison

gitbox 2025-09-19

This article is for developers who want to understand and correctly apply hash functions in PHP. We compare MD5 and SHA-1, offering clear and practical advice on their principles, output, collision resistance, speed, typical use cases, and real-world usage in PHP, while also introducing safer alternatives and usage considerations.

1. Quick Recap of Basic Concepts

  • Hash function: Accepts input of arbitrary length and produces a fixed-length “digest.” Commonly used for data integrity verification, as the basis for digital signatures, indexing, etc.

  • Irreversibility: A hash function should be one-way — in theory, it should not be possible to reconstruct the original input from the digest (though this depends on the attacker’s capability).

  • Collision: When two different inputs produce the same output. An ideal hash should make finding collisions extremely difficult.

2. Technical Specifications: MD5 vs. SHA-1

  • Output Length

    • MD5: 128 bits, usually represented as a 32-character hex string (e.g., d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e).

    • SHA-1: 160 bits, usually represented as a 40-character hex string (e.g., da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709).

  • Security

    • MD5: Proven practical collision attacks exist. Should not be used in security-sensitive contexts (signatures, certificates, password storage, etc.).

    • SHA-1: Stronger than MD5 but also broken in practice (collisions demonstrated in research/experiments). It has been deprecated as a secure hash.

  • Speed

    • MD5 is typically faster than SHA-1 (due to shorter internal state and fewer operations), but on modern hardware speed differences are irrelevant — security matters more.

3. Basic Usage in PHP (Examples)

<?php
$data = "hello world";
<p>// MD5<br>
$md5 = md5($data);         // 32 hex<br>
$md5_raw = md5($data, true); // raw binary 16 bytes</p>
<p>// SHA-1<br>
$sha1 = sha1($data);       // 40 hex<br>
$sha1_raw = sha1($data, true); // raw binary 20 bytes</p>
<p>echo "MD5: $md5\n";<br>
echo "SHA1: $sha1\n";<br>

For message authentication with a key (more secure integrity checks), use HMAC:

<?php
$key = "secret-key";
$data = "important payload";
<p>// Recommended: stronger hash (e.g., sha256)<br>
$hmac = hash_hmac('sha256', $data, $key);<br>
echo "HMAC-SHA256: $hmac\n";<br>

4. Typical Use Cases and Risks

  • Non-security unique identifiers / quick checks (low risk acceptable)

    • MD5 or SHA-1 can be used for file name hashing, simple cache keys, or quick deduplication checks (but not as a guarantee of strict consistency).

  • Security-sensitive scenarios (absolutely not recommended)

    • Password storage, digital signatures, TLS/certificate fingerprints, signature verification, etc.: Do not use MD5/SHA-1. Both are vulnerable to practical collision attacks (especially MD5), allowing attackers to forge different messages with the same digest.

  • File integrity checks

    • If the only concern is accidental corruption during transfer (not active adversaries), MD5/SHA-1 are still used on download pages. But if tampering is a concern, use stronger hashes (SHA-256/512) or signatures (HMAC/public key signatures).

5. Known Attacks (Summary)

  • MD5: Since the early 2000s, multiple practical collision and exploit attacks have been published. Widely abandoned for security purposes.

  • SHA-1: Long considered stronger than MD5, but research and experiments have shown real collisions (e.g., the 2017 academic demonstration). Should also be avoided in high-security contexts.

(Note: This is a brief overview. Public research and practical demonstrations show both are insufficient against collision attacks.)

6. Recommended Practices (PHP)

  1. Always use dedicated password hashing functions: Use password_hash() / password_verify(). PHP’s default (PASSWORD_DEFAULT) applies modern secure algorithms (like bcrypt or better) and automatically handles salting and cost factors.

    <?php
    // Password hashing and verification (example)
    $password = 'user-password';
    $hash = password_hash($password, PASSWORD_DEFAULT);
    // Store $hash in the database
    if (password_verify($password, $hash)) {
        // Verified
    }
    
  2. Use HMAC or signatures for message integrity and authentication: In adversarial environments, use hash_hmac() (e.g., with sha256 or sha512), or public key signatures (openssl_sign, etc.):

    <?php
    $tag = hash_hmac('sha256', $message, $secret_key);
    
  3. For general hashing, prefer SHA-2 or SHA-3 families: For example, sha256, sha512. In PHP, use hash('sha256', $data) or hash('sha512', $data). These are significantly stronger than MD5/SHA-1.

  4. If binary efficiency is needed, use raw binary output (md5($data, true) / sha1($data, true)) and base64-encode the result for storage or transmission.

  5. Don’t roll your own password hashing scheme with “salt + multiple hashing”: It’s error-prone and hard to maintain. Use the officially recommended password hashing APIs.

7. Comparison Summary (Quick Table)

  • Output length: MD5 = 128 bits (32 hex), SHA-1 = 160 bits (40 hex).

  • Security: SHA-1 > MD5, but both are unsuitable for security-critical scenarios.

  • Speed: MD5 is slightly faster, but this should not influence choice (security first).

  • Recommended use: Only for non-security identifiers or compatibility cases. For security, use SHA-2/SHA-3/HMAC/password_hash.

8. Final Recommendation (One Sentence)

If you’re writing new code and care about security, do not use MD5 or SHA-1 — use hash('sha256', $data) / hash_hmac('sha256', $data, $key) for integrity and authentication, and password_hash() for passwords. Only consider MD5/SHA-1 for legacy compatibility or non-security scenarios.